It is correct what is said by Steve Outing in the writings of “The 11 Layers of Citizen Journalism”, the term citizen journalism at this time to be One of the Hottest Buzzword in the world of journalism.
It’s outdated and behind the words of this. Citizen journalism spoken by anyone who observed the development of the media, both those in the circle in the media, such as practitioners, kru and media owners, and those outside the media, observers such as the media. Less gaul, it seems, if the issue behind this.
For those who have long read the dynamics of the world of journalism in the most esensinya, citizen journalism is actually only a problem in each term.
Spiritnya remain the same as public journalism or civic journalism in the famous 80-an. That is, things are not what makes journalism a more ranah is solely occupied by journalists.
Predominantly in the sense produced, managed, and disseminated by the media institutions, in the name of business or political interests.
So, what the difference between public journalism phenomenon with rame-rame soal citizen journalism now? There. The difference, I think, lies in the progress of media technology, so that the spirit of participatory public involvement in defining the issues terakomodasi.
In addition, advances in technology make access to public media to enter the journalism ranah open. Enthusiasm, once again, remain the same. That is, the public journalism approach. The difference, open source in the present had the course, when the more developed media technology.
Definition of Citizen Journalism
Basically, there is no change of activity of journalism is defined around the activity collect, process, and disseminate news. Citizen journalism basically involves such activities.
However, if in conventional journalism pemaknaan (suddenly become old journalism school after citizen journalism appear), who is a journalist event, now the public can also participate and do things that ordinary journalists conducted in media institutions. Therefore, Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis then defines citizen journalism as’ … the act of citizens playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing, and disseminating news and information. “
There are several terms associated with the concept of citizen journalism. Public journalism, advocacy journalism, participatory journalism, participatory media, open source reporting, distributed journalism, citizens media, advocacy journalism, grassroot journalism, until we-the media.
Civic journalism, according to Wikipedia, not because of citizen journalism done by the journalist even though enthusiasm is still senada with public journalism, which is (more) serve the public with the public issues.
Citizen journalism is a specific form of citizen media with the content coming from the public. In Indonesia, the terms appear to citizen journalism or participatory journalism is journalism citizen.
J.D. Lasica, in Online Journalism Review (2003), mengategorikan media citizen journalism into 5 types:
1. Audience participation (such as komenter user who is attached to news stories, personal blogs, photos or video footage captured from handycam private, or local news written by community members).
2. Web site news or information independent (Consumer Reports, Drudge Report).
3. Pure participatory news sites (OhmyNews).
4. Collaborative media sites (Slashdot, Kuro5hin).
5. Other forms of media from the ‘thin’ (mailing list, e-mail newsletter).
6. Private broadcasting sites (video broadcasting sites, such as KenRadio).
There are at least two things that bring style citizen journalism such as this now.
First, a commitment to public voices.
Second, advances in technology that change the landscape mode of communication.
Public journalism is associated with the frequent advocacy journalism concept because some media does not move any further with the issue, but also mengadvokasikan issues to become a “product” or “action” – mengegolkan laws, adding the city parks, open classes for minority groups, forming the government watch, establish a commission supervisor mayor candidates campaign, and others.
Public or citizen journalism hyperlocalism also associated with the commitment that is Luarbiasa on local issues, the “small” (size for mainstream media), so that escape from the mainstream media coverage.
Public journalism with a base model like this most of the initiatives of the media institutions. Infinitude of progress and technology offered by the Internet to make such initiatives may appear from the consumer or audience.
Quite a lot of implications, not simply reinforce participatory aspects and issues raised.
Issues and Implications Citizen journalism
I believe that the advances in technology (communication) or change the landscape of social spaces we.
The development of citizen journalism has made incredible-I grew up in the tradition of Old School for Journalism invites a number of implications that are not small.
Some of them, which is observed by me, is as follows:
1. Open source reporting: changes to the news collection. Journalists do not become the sole collector of information. However, in the context of a journalist should also ‘compete’ with the audience, who provide firsthand reporting from the field.
2. Changes in the management of the news. Do not rely solely on open source reporting, the media is now no longer be the only manager news, but also must compete with the sites established by private citizens in the interest of the public as citizen journalism.
3. Mengaburnya limit the producers and consumers. Media often memosisikan as news producers, consumers now also become the news with a quote from the news sites citizens. Similarly, vice versa. Audience that is often positioned as a news consumer, within the scope of citizen journalism to become producers of news content is also accessible by mainstream media. Oh my God, duniaaa ….
4. Points 1-2-3 show audience as active participants in producing, mengkreasi, would also mendiseminasi news and information. This factor in turn create ‘a new balance-of power’ the new distribution of power. Threat of a new power (like if called as a threat) for the institution of the press not from the government and ideology, or fellow competitors, but from the audience or consumers who usually serve them!
5. Issues of professionalism: whether each of citizen journalism can be called a journalist? In fact, the citizen journalism slogan everybody could be a journalist! What bloggers can be referred to as the real journalist?
6. Ethical issue: whether the individual citizen journalism have to comply with the standards of journalism among journalists apply for this product so that it can be called a work of journalism? We are talking a matter of journalistic principle, which is taught in the journalist-can rule was still valid? Often, the discourse in frequent touch rule is a matter of journalistic objectivity coverage, and the credibility of journalists / media.
7. Regulatory issues: Is the regulation for the citizen journalism? Relation to ethics, professionalism, komersialiasi, quality and content.
8. Economic issues: the emergence of sites of citizen journalism that many visited cause economic consequences, namely the advertiser, which is not small. Press, according to Jay X is basically the media franchise franchise or public service in journalism.
9. If the citizen media and also now appear in the play ranah commercial, this is only a consequence ‘the enlarging of the media franchise. Economic issues are also invited another debate. If the contributor was citizen journalism news voluntarily entered, is now emerging debate how they should pay.
Have paid, of course there are standards that must be obeyed according bayarannya. Finally, this invite-entry issues of professionalism in the context of something that eventually even a certain ‘opposite’ with the spirit of citizen journalism.
How the fate the old school journalism in the future with the emergence of citizen journalism? Are old school tradition of journalism will still survive in the future?
That’s some issues that will always be raised and discussed in a seminar that talked any particulars citizen journalism.
Citizen Journalism in Indonesia
I started the public journalism phenomenon in mid-1990s. One thing that encourage me is whether the concept of development journalism or journalism of the curriculum taught in journalism studies in 1980-1995an (I was one of the products!) Is extant public journalism? I decided, NO.
First, aspects partisipatorinya not real. Fixed issue decided by the media (frequent top ‘blessing’ The Department of)-even though the slogan of development, anywhere, always declare subjugate themselves to the public.
Second, the ideology of development journalism is basically the ideology of development communication that have been bankrupt in the year 80-an (dibangkrutkan by its own penggagasnya as Everett M. Rogers), because they are too ideological, Utopian, and totalitarian.
I am interested in the geliat citizen journalism in Indonesia, through discussions with friends activist concerning open source reporting that seems to correct the senada posts Pepih Nugraha in Kompas daily, that the particulars of participatory journalism.
I follow Indonesiasatu.net who proclaim themselves as citizen journalism. Invitation to look in this site is convincing, with good looks tergarap (updatingnya albeit slowly), there are profiles of the example, but honestly just disappointed because I did not find anything different with the other daily.
It’s like reading the local news from local newspapers which can be accessed online via the local media, this site is no need to proclaim itself as the (figure) pengusung citizen journalism.
Hyperlocalism which I imagine is not like this. So many news hodgepodge without a clear idea of the structure, without the site visitor on the show this would actually be brought to Where.
This is pure open source reporting, but I wonder, what is citizen journalism exist (instead of citizen reporting)?
Pesta Blogger Indonesia strengthen the appeal citizen journalism. The growth in blogs indeed any phenomenon Luarbiasa – 13,000 established blog every day!.
But, when visiting some blogs that he said many in-hit, I only get foreverglo foreverglo-personal view is without importance for the public? (Although, just honest, I enjoy the personal foreverglo).
Or, what kind of public issue that can properly dimaknai from foreverglo is personal? I thought, blog are likely to open the open source reporting, a blog and blogger The growth conditions that are conducive to bring citizen journalism, but the blog just is not enough to be given predicate is pro-citizen journalism.
Citizen Journalism, in other words, is not that easy!
Of some phenomenon before, I learn many things. One of them is a matter of issue. I learned that from there to enter the world of citizen journalism, which seems to have brought not just the standard reporting capabilities and preparing news ala 5W + 1 H.
But it also matters how the issue of ‘the personal becomes public, the personal becomes public. Without it, I think, just get the public information series without meaning.
A citizen journalism site become the property of citizen, public property, if many visitors. Thus, the citizen journalism should be able to maintain the site contents, and to invite public participation, to open discussions in a clear frame (a matter of quality, so-so controversial).
Without all this, as well as any site, and any sebombastis slogan jurnalismenya, only to become a site-filled desert, comedy, dikeploki by their own managers. Unfortunately, because of the potential resources, so tersia anymore.
However, I am happy with the phenomenon of new and serious challenges that appear by citizen journalism.
I think the effect will be good for both of them, both for the public and the mainstream media. As the system of the press and strong dibingkai influenced by local culture, I also believe, citizen journalism exist alone in the end will vary according to the local community culture mengusungnya. (Source: rumahkiri.net)